Unlawful Access: Can Your Housing Society Legally Restrict You from Entrances or Amenities Based on Flat Size under Society Law?
The definitive answer is No. Under Society Law, a housing society in India cannot legally restrict residents from using a particular entrance or amenity based solely on their flat size or location within the building. Such actions constitute arbitrary discrimination, directly violating the principle of equal rights enshrined in Cooperative Housing Law and the governing Society Bye Laws.
Every flat owner, whether you own a small apartment or a large penthouse, is a co-owner of the common areas, including entrances, lifts, and recreational amenities. Any move by the Managing Committee or the Advisory Committee to create a class distinction among members regarding the use of these common facilities is generally considered void, unenforceable, and a breach of Society legal compliance. We explain your fundamental rights, the relevant Society Act provisions, and the actionable steps you must take to challenge such unfair restrictions
Understanding Your Equal Access Rights Under Society Law
As a member of a co-operative or apartment society, you have fundamental and non-negotiable rights to use shared property and amenities. Various statutes, including state-specific Cooperative Societies Acts (such as the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960) and central laws like the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA Advisory), protect these rights.
The Core Principle: Equality of Members
The central tenet of Cooperative Housing Law is the equality of members.
- Undivided Share: You hold an undivided proportionate share in the common areas, which include the main entrance, lobbies, elevators, gardens, pools, and clubhouses. Your right to use these areas is not dependent on the size or monetary value of your flat.
- Discrimination is Illegal: Restrictions based on flat size (e.g., denying smaller flat owners access to the main entrance or an exclusive clubhouse) directly violate Article 14 of the Constitution of India, which guarantees equality before the law, and are contrary to Civil law housing norms.
- The Society Act Mandate: The governing Society Act only allows for restrictions that are reasonable, necessary for safety, maintenance, or security (e.g., timing the use of the pool), and apply uniformly to all members.
Scrutinising Society Bye Laws and Restrictions
While a housing society has the power to frame Society Bye Laws, these laws must be in compliance with the parent Act.
- Requirement for Validity: A restriction is valid only if the Society Bye Laws explicitly include it, the majority of members approve it during an AGM Compliance process, and it does not discriminate against any resident.
- Ultra Vires: If the Managing Committee tries to implement a rule that restricts access based on flat size or location and contradicts the principles of equality or Apartment law India, the rule exceeds its legal authority and residents can easily challenge it.
- Real World Scenario: For example, allowing only owners of flats above a certain square footage to use a specific lift is an arbitrary restriction and creates a clear Housing Dispute waiting to happen.
Common Discriminatory Scenarios and Actionable Legal Steps
NRIs and OCIs, in particular, must be vigilant, as their absence can sometimes be exploited by a biased committee to pass unfair rules.
Common Discriminatory Scenarios
You may encounter these unfair restrictions in your housing society:
- Separate Entrance Mandate: Your society mandates that owners of smaller flats use a separate, less convenient entrance while reserving the main lobby for larger flat owners. This violates equal access to common property under Property law and Building society norms.
- Denying Amenity Use: The committee tries to restrict your access to the swimming pool, gym, or clubhouse because your flat is in a specific wing or below a certain size threshold. This breaches your collective ownership rights to shared amenities as outlined in your registered Deed of Declaration.
- Arbitrary Parking Allocation: The committee implements a rule giving premium basement parking exclusively to large flat owners, assigning open parking to smaller flat owners based purely on size, ignoring the original sale deed. This contradicts the principle of fair use of common areas and can affect the title under the Transfer of Property Law.
Actionable Steps for the Member
If you face any of these issues, take these steps:
- Formal Objection: Immediately send a detailed written letter to the Managing Committee and the Registrar of Co-operative Societies.
- Cite Law: Clearly reference the specific clause in the Society Bye Laws or the Society Act that the restriction violates.
- Review and Challenge: Review your sale agreement and Deed of Declaration. Call for an Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) to amend or revoke the illegal resolution.
- Seek Statutory Relief: If the Advisory Committee ignores your request, escalating the matter to the Registrar of Co-operative Societies or the Co-operative Court is the correct legal recourse for resolving a Housing Dispute. If the builder or society is still within the RERA framework, file a complaint with the RERA Advisory authority.
Key Takeaway: Always start with a written, formal communication. This documentation is crucial evidence should you need to escalate the matter.
Maintenance Concerns vs. Access Restriction
A common justification for differential treatment is often linked to varying Maintenance Concerns or contributions. However, it is vital to separate these two issues:
- Differential Maintenance is Legal: A housing society can legally charge different maintenance amounts, such as based on flat area or a combination of fixed and area-based charges, as long as the society approves the formula in the Society Bye Laws.
- Access Denial is Not: A member’s higher or lower contribution to maintenance does not grant the committee the legal right to restrict their access to common areas or amenities. The remedy for non-payment (Recovery of Society Dues) is a statutory recovery process (like Section 101 of the MCS Act in Maharashtra), not the denial of essential access.
Landmark Precedents: Recent rulings by High Courts, including the Bombay High Court, have reinforced that even while the method of calculating maintenance may vary, the right to use the common facilities remains equal for all members.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) for NRIs and OCIs – Society Law
- Can NRIs recover funds if access is denied?
Yes. You can pursue recovery or damages through a legal representative if the society acts unlawfully.
- Can an NRI challenge amenity restrictions from abroad?
Yes. You can file complaints via an authorised representative, the society portal, or the Registrar. Virtual hearings are often allowed.
- Do OCIs have the same rights under Cooperative Housing Law?
Yes. OCIs cannot be discriminated against and can invoke RERA Section 19 for common area claims.
- Are bye-law restrictions for smaller flats valid?
No. Arbitrary restrictions favouring larger flats are usually invalid and can be challenged legally.
- Can access be restricted for unpaid society dues?
No. Essential services like entrances and primary lifts cannot be blocked; only non-essential amenities may be restricted if legally permitted.
Outlook
The future of Housing regulations in India strongly leans towards stricter enforcement of non-discriminatory rules. Any rule that attempts to restrict a resident from using a common amenity or entrance based on arbitrary classifications like flat size or location is inherently flawed and highly susceptible to legal challenge. The path to resolution involves rigorous adherence to documentation and utilising the statutory remedies provided under the Society Act and RERA.
In conclusion, your housing society cannot legally restrict your use of common entrances or amenities based on the size or location of your flat. Take proactive, documented steps to safeguard your rights under Society Law and challenge the management committee immediately.
LawCrust Legal Consulting specialises in providing comprehensive legal solutions for all your Society Law issues, including challenging discriminatory practices, managing Housing Dispute matters, and ensuring Society legal compliance for our NRI and OCI clients globally.
About LawCrust Legal Consultation.
LawCrust Legal Consulting, a subsidiary of LawCrust Global Consulting Ltd., is a trusted legal partner for NRIs and Indians across the globe. Backed by a team of over 70 expert lawyers and more than 25 empanelled law firms, we offer a wide range of Premium Legal Services both in India and internationally. Our expertise spans across legal finance, litigation management, matrimonial disputes, property matters, estate planning, heirship certificates, RERA, and builder-related legal issues.
In addition to personal legal matters, LawCrust also provides expert support in complex corporate areas such as foreign direct investment (FDI), foreign institutional investment (FII), mergers & acquisitions, and fundraising. We also assist clients with OCI and immigration matters, startup solutions, and hybrid consulting solutions. Consistently ranked among the top legal consulting firms in India, LawCrust proudly delivers customised legal solutions across the UK, USA, Canada, Europe, Australia, APAC, and EMEA, offering culturally informed and cross-border expertise to meet the unique needs of the global Indian community.