Litigation Funding in India: A Practical, Simple Guide

Facing a strong legal claim but worried about the cost? You are not alone. In India, many people and businesses drop good cases because they lack money to pay lawyers, experts, and court fees. Litigation Funding in India changes that. It lets an outside investor or company pay your legal costs in return for a share of any money you win. If you lose, you usually owe nothing. This article explains how it works, why it matters, the legal rules, practical steps to follow, risks to watch for, and how to choose a good funder all in simple language.

What is Litigation Funding?

Litigation Funding in India is when a third party pays some or all of your legal bills. The funder and you sign an agreement that says how much the funder will cover and what share of the award or settlement they will take if you win. The usual model is non‑recourse: the funder gets paid only if you win. If you lose, the funder usually loses its money.

This is different from a lawyer taking a cut of the winnings. In India, lawyers must follow strict professional rules about contingency fees. That means funding by a non‑lawyer third party is the common route.

Why Litigation Funding in India Matters

• It makes justice more reachable for people and small businesses who cannot afford long legal fights.
• It lets claimants hire specialist lawyers and experts for complex cases.
• It lets companies protect valuable rights (like patents or contracts) without draining working capital.
• It shifts financial risk to professionals who check the case carefully before investing.

In short, funding can level the playing field against richer opponents and help valid claims move forward.

How the Process Usually Works

The typical journey with a funder looks like this:

• Application and initial check: You give the funder basic case details. They decide whether the claim seems worth reviewing.
• Due diligence: The funder studies your facts, evidence, legal issues, expected recovery, and enforcement chances. This can take a few weeks to a few months.
• Funding agreement: If the funder likes the case, you sign a contract that sets funding amount, what costs are covered, the funder’s share, who controls settlement decisions, and who pays adverse costs if you lose.
• Case proceeds: You and your lawyer run the case. Most funders do not control legal strategy but ask for updates and need approval rights on big decisions in some deals.
• Outcome: If you win or settle, you pay the funder the agreed share. If you lose, the funder often gets nothing.

Types of Funding You May See

• Third‑party non‑recourse funding: Funder pays costs and gets a share only if you win.
• Contingency fee work: Lawyers take a fee based on the result — this is limited by Bar Council rules in India.
• Claim purchase: A funder buys your claim for a price or agrees to finance it in return for assignment rights.
• Portfolio funding: A funder backs a mix of cases to spread risk.

The Legal Landscape in India

India does not yet have a single law that only deals with litigation funding. Instead, these agreements use general contract and commercial laws. Important legal bits to know:

• Indian Contract Act, 1872 — funds are usually treated as contracts that must not break public policy.
• Transfer of Property Act, 1882 — defines “actionable claim” and supports assignments of claims.
• Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — courts have powers to manage cases and order security for costs if needed.
• Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — relevant where funding supports arbitrations; arbitral tribunals can decide costs or ask for disclosure.
• Limitation Act, 1963 — beware of time limits when assigning or financing claims.
• Bar Council rules — lawyers must protect independence and follow ethics in any funding setup.

Court decisions have made clear that third‑party funders who are not lawyers can lawfully fund litigation. For example, the Supreme Court in Bar Council of India v. A.K. Balaji confirmed that non‑lawyer funders can support litigation, provided the arrangement stays within public policy and does not interfere with legal independence.

International and Helpful Authorities

Indian lawyers also look at foreign cases for guidance. A famous English case, Arkin v. Borchard, discussed funders’ roles and when they might pay adverse costs. While India follows its own law, international decisions help shape best practices on disclosure and cost risk.

Practical Steps for Claimants and Businesses

Follow these simple steps before you sign anything:

• Prepare a short litigation memo: Summarise the facts, documents, legal points, likely remedy, and a realistic budget. Funders want to see merit and recoverable value.
• Vet the funder: Check their track record, team, sample term sheets, and references.
• Negotiate key terms: Decide funding amount, drawdown plan, funder’s return, who can settle, confidentiality, termination rights, and who pays adverse costs.
• Protect lawyer independence: Make sure the agreement clearly says the lawyer keeps professional judgment and the client controls settlement decisions.
• Plan for adverse costs and security: Courts can require security. Agree who will post security or buy litigation insurance.
• Check tax and accounting: Think about GST, income tax treatment, and how to record the funding in accounts.
• Get independent legal advice: Ask a lawyer who does not represent the funder to review the funding agreement.

What to Put in the Funding Contract

• Clear definitions and the scope of funding.
• Drawdown schedule and permitted use of funds.
• How the funder will be paid (percentage, fixed fee, hybrid).
• Settlement approval procedure and who can sign settlement documents.
• Priority of payments, security for funder’s expenses, and post‑termination rights.
• Confidentiality terms and how to handle court or tribunal disclosure obligations.
• Governing law and a practical dispute resolution mechanism like arbitration.

Common Risks and How to Reduce Them

• Loss of control: Keep clear clauses that preserve claimant and counsel control over legal choices.
• Adverse cost orders: Decide upfront who bears these costs and consider insurance.
• Ethical problems: Use reputable funders and follow Bar Council rules to avoid conflicts.
• Confidentiality leaks: Use NDAs and carefully manage privileged documents.
• Enforceability issues: Draft agreements under a predictable law and forum to avoid surprises.

Where Litigation Funding in India Is Most Used

• Commercial arbitration and high‑value contract disputes.
• Intellectual property fights and patent or trademark claims.
• Insolvency litigation to recover assets for creditors.
• Shareholder disputes and minority oppression claims.
• Large consumer or mass claims where grouping claims is possible.

Timeline: How Long to Secure Funding?

Simple cases may close in a few weeks. Most funders take between 4–12 weeks for due diligence and negotiation. Complex, multi‑jurisdictional claims can take longer.

FAQs

1. What is litigation funding?

Ans: It is when a third party pays legal costs and gets a share if you win. If you lose, they usually get nothing.

2. Is it legal in India?

Ans: Yes. Courts accept third‑party funding when it follows public policy and does not affect lawyer independence.

3. Who pays adverse costs if I lose?

Ans: The funding agreement should say. Sometimes the claimant pays; sometimes the funder accepts limited liability or insurance covers it.

4. Do I have to tell the court or arbitrator?

Ans: Disclosure rules vary. Where a funder controls or could create conflict, tribunals often expect disclosure. Draft the agreement with this in mind.

5. How do I find a good funder?

Ans: Look for experience, references, transparent terms, and a solid track record. Ask lawyers for trusted names.

6. How long does funding take?

Ans: Usually 4–12 weeks, depending on complexity.

7. Can a company assign a claim to a funder?

Ans: Yes, with care. Assignments must follow law and avoid limitation or enforceability problems.

Outlook: Where This Is Headed

Litigation Funding in India looks set to grow. Courts and regulators will likely give clearer rules on disclosure, costs and ethics. Funders will standardise contracts and work closely with law firms to protect client independence. For claimants and businesses, funding will keep becoming a smart way to pursue fair outcomes without giving up daily cash flow.

About LawCrust Legal Consulting

LawCrust Legal Consulting, a part of LawCrust Global Consulting Ltd., stands as one of India’s trusted names in legal and consulting services. Our team works across a wide range of areas to support both businesses and individuals.

We offer services such as litigation finance, legal protection, litigation management, startup support, fundraising guidance, hybrid consulting, mergers and acquisitions, insolvency & bankruptcy, and debt restructuring.

We also help people with matrimonial matters, property disputes, criminal cases, civil issues, immigration concerns, NRI legal support, society matters, and estate planning. Along with this, we provide ALSP and LPO services to clients in India and overseas.

Our network includes more than fifty offices across India and a team of over seventy specialised lawyers. This helps us offer steady and reliable support for many legal needs.

You can also use our legal app to connect with lawyers quickly. It is one of the most helpful legal apps available, so feel free to download it.

LawCrust Groups also includes several companies such as LawCrust Realty, LawCrust Ventures, LawCrust Hybrid Consulting, Gensact, LawCrust Foundation, and LawCrust Consumer Products.

Need Legal Help? Contact Us

You can reach us anytime for expert legal support.

• Call: +91 8097842911
• Email: inquiry@lawcrust.com
• You can also book an online legal consultation whenever you need it.