The Legal Financial Revolution: Litigation Finance in India’s M&A Landscape (2025 Update)
The landscape of corporate growth and dispute resolution in India is changing. As Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) intensify especially in high-value sectors like technology and e-commerce so do the legal complexities and inevitable disputes. Litigation finance, also called third-party litigation funding, is reshaping this space. It empowers businesses and individuals to pursue rightful claims without carrying the crushing cost upfront.
This guide explores how litigation finance is transforming access to justice, M&A-related disputes, and corporate risk management in India in 2025. You’ll find practical insights on legal frameworks, financial implications, and regional nuances to make informed decisions.
Introduction to Litigation Finance in India: A Necessity, Not a Novelty-Legal Financial
Litigation finance lets a neutral third party fund legal costs for a claimant or law firm. In return, the funder takes a share of the proceeds only if the case succeeds. The model is non-recourse: if the case fails, the claimant pays nothing.
- The Financial Imperative
India’s judicial process is lengthy, and legal fees can consume up to 31% of a final award. This high cost often deters rightful claims. Litigation funding addresses the problem by shifting risk from the litigant to the funder.
For businesses, it preserves working capital. Instead of diverting funds into lawsuits, companies can keep resources focused on growth. In Mumbai and Delhi, specialised litigation finance companies are increasingly helping businesses manage these costs.
The Legal Framework: Court Recognition and Regulatory Ambiguity
India lacks a nationwide statute for third-party funding. Still, courts have recognised its validity, making it a viable legal-financial tool.
- Key Precedents and State-Level Rules
- Judicial Recognition: In Bar Council of India v. A.K. Balaji (2018), the Supreme Court confirmed that third-party funding is permissible. However, it warned against unethical practices such as funders controlling case outcomes.
- CPC Amendments: Several states Maharashtra, Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, and Uttar Pradesh have amended the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) under Order XXV. These changes allow courts to secure costs from funders, ensuring accountability.
- Arbitration & IBC: Arbitration, governed by the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, naturally supports funding in commercial disputes, including post-M&A conflicts. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016, is also enabling funding in insolvency litigation, especially in distressed asset acquisitions.
- Regulatory Developments (2025)
- Central Regulation: Parliament is debating central rules to align with global practices and curb misuse.
- FEMA Compliance: For cross-border funding, the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA), 1999, requires Reserve Bank of India (RBI) approval in some cases. Recently, Indian banks sought RBI clearance to use litigation funding for recovering overseas debt signaling growing legitimacy.
M&A Linkages: Where Corporate Transactions Meet Litigation Finance
Litigation finance is becoming crucial in corporate transactions. Disputes can surface at any stage of M&A, and funding helps manage risks while preserving deal value.
- Post-M&A Dispute Funding
- Indemnity and Warranty Claims: Buyers often discover breaches of Representations and Warranties (R&W) after closing. With funding, they can pursue indemnity claims without draining post-merger budgets.
- Valuation Disputes: Earn-out disagreements, working capital adjustments, or delayed payments are common. Funders help unlock the value of such contingent claims.
- Distressed Asset Acquisitions: Under IBC deals, targets may hold valuable litigation rights. Funded claims increase the overall return on distressed asset investments.
- Due Diligence and Valuation Impact
Legal due diligence often reveals pending disputes, IP conflicts, or regulatory violations. These findings affect valuation.
Funders also conduct their own diligence, assessing case strength, recovery potential, and costs. They typically expect a 20–40% return on the award if successful. Fundable claims can even be carved out in purchase agreements, creating a separate “litigation award” that benefits both buyer and seller.
Key Legal and Financial Challenges and Mitigation Strategies
Despite its benefits, litigation funding faces legal and ethical gray zones.
- Regulatory Gaps: No central law creates uncertainty. Champerty concerns linger, though courts relax them for commercial civil cases.
- Lawyer Ethics: Funders cannot influence a lawyer’s independence or case strategy. Bar Council rules strictly enforce this.
- Disclosure Issues: Nationwide disclosure rules are absent, though Mumbai courts may require them for transparency.
- Taxation: Funded awards are treated as income under the Income Tax Act, 1961, creating tax planning needs.
- Regional Differences: Cities like Bengaluru and Mumbai are funding hubs. In slower rural courts, timelines and projections become harder.
- Mitigation Strategies
- Draft clear Litigation Funding Agreements defining terms, costs, and claimant control.
- Use escrow and indemnity holdbacks during M&A to cover hidden risks.
- Limit adverse cost exposure through contractual safeguards.
Expert Tips for Utilising Litigation Finance
- Choose Reputable Funders: Work with established players like LegalPay or LitiCap. Their financial stability ensures reliable support.
- Do Due Diligence: Check the funder’s track record and watch for hidden fees.
- Engage Lawyers Early: Experienced counsel can evaluate case strength and draft strong agreements.
- Consider Individual Cases: While commercial claims dominate, individuals such as property litigants can also seek funding. Low-income litigants may access support through the National Legal Services Authority (NALSA), particularly in cities like Kolkata.
Conclusion
Litigation finance is no longer niche. It has become integral to India’s corporate and judicial ecosystem.
With 2025 updates expanded state CPC amendments, the 2024 Delhi High Court ruling, and the rise of the Indian Association for Litigation Finance (IALF) momentum is strong. This tool democratizes justice, shields corporate capital, and adds value in M&A and disputes, especially in fast-moving sectors like technology and e-commerce.
About LawCrust Legal Consultation.
LawCrust Legal Consulting, a subsidiary of LawCrust Global Consulting Ltd., is a trusted legal partner for NRIs and Indians across the globe. Backed by a team of over 70 expert lawyers and more than 25 empanelled law firms, we offer a wide range of Premium Legal Services both in India and internationally. Our expertise spans across legal finance, litigation management, matrimonial disputes, property matters, estate planning, heirship certificates, RERA, and builder-related legal issues.
In addition to personal legal matters, LawCrust also provides expert support in complex corporate areas such as foreign direct investment (FDI), foreign institutional investment (FII), mergers & acquisitions, and fundraising. We also assist clients with OCI and immigration matters, startup solutions, and hybrid consulting solutions. Consistently ranked among the top legal consulting firms in India, LawCrust proudly delivers customised legal solutions across the UK, USA, Canada, Europe, Australia, APAC, and EMEA, offering culturally informed and cross-border expertise to meet the unique needs of the global Indian community.